You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/blog/2025/marimo-acquisition-multi-stakeholder-governance/index.md
+10-7Lines changed: 10 additions & 7 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -20,18 +20,21 @@ This acquisition also highlights something important: **the value of multi-stake
20
20
21
21
For years, people have talked about Marimo "replacing" [Jupyter](../../../collaborators/jupyter/). At a product level, Marimo has indeed built an excellent tool and platform. For example, they've really moved the needle on reactive notebook workflows (and we're excited about community projects like [ipyflow](https://github.com/ipyflow/ipyflow) that build on ideas [originally explored by the Cal Poly Jupyter team 7 years ago](https://github.com/jupytercalpoly/reactivepy)).
22
22
23
-
But **[Jupyter](../../../collaborators/jupyter/)differentiates in a key way**: it's governed and led by a community of peers, not a single company.
23
+
But **Marimo cannot replace Jupyter without replacing its core differentiating value**: [Jupyter](../../../collaborators/jupyter/)is governed and led by a community of peers, not a single company (see [the Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure (POSI)](https://openscholarlyinfrastructure.org/) for one explanation of what this looks like and why it's important for the scientific and scholarly ecosystem).
24
24
25
-
This acquisition demonstrates why that matters. Marimo's product roadmap is now driven by CoreWeave's business strategy. That might be great for users, or it might not. Either way, it highlights how single-company ownership shapes the direction of tools that communities depend on.
25
+
This acquisition demonstrates why that matters. Marimo's product roadmap is now driven by CoreWeave's business strategy. That might be great for users, or it might not. Either way, it highlights how single-company ownership shapes the direction of tools that communities depend on (this is exacerbated by the fact that Marimo requires contributors to [sign this CLA](https://marimo.io/cla) giving up the rights to your contribution, and allowing them to change the license if they wish).
26
26
27
27
## Jupyter will never be acquired
28
28
29
29
That's a feature, not a bug.
30
30
31
-
We're excited to continue supporting [Jupyter](/collaborators/jupyter/)as a healthy, multi-stakeholder community. This means things like:
31
+
Multi-stakeholder governance means [Jupyter's](../../../collaborators/jupyter/)future is decided by its community, not by any single company's acquisition or business pivot.
32
32
33
-
-**Foundational governance contributions**: Serving on [Jupyter's Executive Council](https://jupyter.org/governance/executive_council.html) and co-leading several sub-projects
34
-
-**Community building**: Supporting JupyterCon and the Community Building working group
35
-
-**Long-term investment**: Building infrastructure that strengthens the entire ecosystem
33
+
This is why Jupyter is a core part of 2i2c's own mission and product strategy: we want to co-create a healthy open source ecosystem of peers. We've built our own organization around similar principles:
36
34
37
-
Multi-stakeholder governance means [Jupyter's](../../../collaborators/jupyter/) future is decided by its community, not by any single company's acquisition or business pivot. This is a core part of the open source ecosystem we all rely on, and 2i2c's team is excited to continue supporting that ecosystem.
35
+
-**[Open practices and transparency](../../../open-practices/)**: Our strategy, operations, and decision-making processes are all done in public, with an upstream-first approach to development.
36
+
-**[Right to Replicate](../../../right-to-replicate/)**: Communities can take their infrastructure and run it themselves if we're not serving their needs
37
+
-**[Commitment to open technology](../../../open-technology/)**: We build on and contribute to openly-governed projects like Jupyter
38
+
-**[Foundational contributions](../foundational-contributions/)**: We dedicate team capacity to upstream governance, maintenance, and community building
39
+
40
+
Open, multi-stakeholder governance is a core part of the open source ecosystem we all rely on. Communities that follow this model need support from their network of contributors. That's why 2i2c will continue supporting communities like Jupyter that embody these values.
0 commit comments