LiteLLM Performance Roadmap

[AlexsanderHamir]

Hi all,

Sharing our public roadmap on LiteLLM performance overheads:

As of v1.78.5, the LiteLLM AI Gateway adds a 8 ms median overhead and 45 ms P99 overhead at 1 K concurrent requests with 4 LiteLLM instances.

This is an ~80% improvement over v1.76.0. This roadmap has 3 key components we plan on achieving by end of 2025:

1. Achieve 8 ms median across all major LLM endpoints.
2. Resolve open memory leak issues.
3. Achieve 4 ms median overhead across all major LLM endpoints.

You can read a detailed breakdown of each component below.

---

Roadmap & Goals

1. Reduce latency across endpoints (Target: Nov 30, 2025)

Achieve 8 ms median overhead and 45 ms P99 overhead on the setup described above for the following endpoints:

• /chat/completions
• /responses
• /embeddings
• /realtime
• /audio/speech
• /audio/transcriptions

---

2. Address memory issues (Target: Nov 30, 2025)

• Resolve all reported memory leaks:

  • Discussion #15100
  • Issue #12685
  • Issue #14540
  • Issue #15128

• Lower LiteLLM’s overall memory footprint:

  • Currently, a single worker consumes ~500 MB, with ~200 MB used by Prisma imports.

• Reduce LiteLLM’s memory allocations per request.

---

3. Halve LiteLLM’s overhead (Target: Dec 31, 2025)

• Target 4 ms median and 22.5 ms P99 on the same setup described below.
• Components may be moved to Rust if required to meet performance goals.

---

Feedback

Is there anything you'd like to see us address related to LiteLLM performance this year?
Comment below — we're happy to work with you.

---

Appendix: Test Setup

Load Testing Configuration

• Tool: Locust
• Load: 1 K RPS
• Endpoint: /chat/completions

Environment

Parameter	Configuration
Instances	4 LiteLLM nodes
CPUs	4 vCPUs per instance
Memory	8 GB RAM per instance
Database	Postgres
Redis	Disabled

References

• Locust test file →
• LiteLLM config file →

[jaswanth8888]

Hi @AlexsanderHamir , can you share the ENV variables worker configurations and db configurations used as well or if you are using helm cna you share values.yaml

[AlexsanderHamir]

Hello @jaswanth8888, yes of course, I will create gists with all that information and attach it to the announcement.

[athoik]

@AlexsanderHamir you are doing great job! Kudos!

I would love to see memory issues resolved, already considering to use MAX_REQUESTS_BEFORE_RESTART but I'll wait for newer version, since no such trick would required any more.

[AlexsanderHamir]

@AlexsanderHamir you are doing great job! Kudos!

I would love to see memory issues resolved, already considering to use MAX_REQUESTS_BEFORE_RESTART but I'll wait for newer version, since no such trick would required any more.

Thank you @athoik ! We've been able to fix a major memory leak, and I believe we have just one more that is causing pods to run OOM.