-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
Description
I really miss the following syntax I stumbled upon in my app:
int a, int b = tx.inputs[0].nftCommitment.split(8);
Instead I need to express it as:
bytes aBytes, bytes bBytes = tx.inputs[0].nftCommitment.split(8); int a = int(aBytes); int b = int(bBytes);
Originally posted by @mainnet-pat in #178
Some thoughts on this:
This would likely add 2 OP_BIN2NUM
to convert the bytes
to int
. So it would add some "magic" to the operation / it would overload the .split()
operator to have different functioning depending on what it is assigning to. I don't know if that is something we want to introduce. Especially since we're also critically looking at our current type-casting implementation, which also has some overloading that we want to get rid of.
I think if we're adding "magic" then I'd prefer to take it one step further and go for a full magic struct decoding, where you could specify the structure of the encoded data, and decode any part of that magically. See #27.