Using this test code: https://github.com/airlift/airlift/blob/master/json/src/test/java/io/airlift/json/TestJsonModule.java#L101-L110
which explicitly tests that in an object mapper that has all autodetection disabled: https://github.com/airlift/airlift/blob/master/json/src/main/java/io/airlift/json/ObjectMapperProvider.java#L107-L130
This test passes with Jackson 2.8. With Jackson 2.9, it reports
[ERROR] testFieldDetection(io.airlift.json.TestJsonModule) Time elapsed: 0.007 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: Sets differ: expected [make, model, year, purchased, nameList] but got [make, model, year, purchased, notes, nameList]
at io.airlift.json.TestJsonModule.testFieldDetection(TestJsonModule.java:109)
So the field, that is supposed to not-detected by Jackson is detected by 2.9 (but not by 2.8). I tested with 2.8.1 (passes), 2.8.11 (passes), 2.9.0 (fails) and 2.9.4 (fails).
Looking through the release notes I did not find anything that would explain this behavior (or how to turn it off), so I consider that an actual regression.
Using this test code: https://github.com/airlift/airlift/blob/master/json/src/test/java/io/airlift/json/TestJsonModule.java#L101-L110
which explicitly tests that in an object mapper that has all autodetection disabled: https://github.com/airlift/airlift/blob/master/json/src/main/java/io/airlift/json/ObjectMapperProvider.java#L107-L130
This test passes with Jackson 2.8. With Jackson 2.9, it reports
[ERROR] testFieldDetection(io.airlift.json.TestJsonModule) Time elapsed: 0.007 s <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: Sets differ: expected [make, model, year, purchased, nameList] but got [make, model, year, purchased, notes, nameList]
at io.airlift.json.TestJsonModule.testFieldDetection(TestJsonModule.java:109)
So the field, that is supposed to not-detected by Jackson is detected by 2.9 (but not by 2.8). I tested with 2.8.1 (passes), 2.8.11 (passes), 2.9.0 (fails) and 2.9.4 (fails).
Looking through the release notes I did not find anything that would explain this behavior (or how to turn it off), so I consider that an actual regression.