You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've updated some text details as part of the changes for issue #966. It was not immediately obvious what section applies to what feature, and the features are just in a list without any organizing principle.
the sections needs a leading graphic (e.g. screen shot of a browser with different fonts shown) which will make the text much more understandable.
the Topics section needs another level of heading, such as Projects Browser, Preferences, etc., or whatever (which could certainly change over time). I suppose packaging would be Rowan Implementation impacting Jadeite.
the font sections needs to be updated with the changes in 3.2.13 and post 3.2.13 to support named fonts.
It would be a good habit to add a section each time we do a release. Some that might be useful are the preferences file, transaction handling (I think there is some material that could be lifted from RNs).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've updated some text details as part of the changes for issue #966. It was not immediately obvious what section applies to what feature, and the features are just in a list without any organizing principle.
the sections needs a leading graphic (e.g. screen shot of a browser with different fonts shown) which will make the text much more understandable.
the Topics section needs another level of heading, such as Projects Browser, Preferences, etc., or whatever (which could certainly change over time). I suppose packaging would be Rowan Implementation impacting Jadeite.
the font sections needs to be updated with the changes in 3.2.13 and post 3.2.13 to support named fonts.
It would be a good habit to add a section each time we do a release. Some that might be useful are the preferences file, transaction handling (I think there is some material that could be lifted from RNs).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: