Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Community Wiki link on Publii resources #2020

Open
bjazmoore opened this issue Feb 12, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[Feature Request]: Community Wiki link on Publii resources #2020

bjazmoore opened this issue Feb 12, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@bjazmoore
Copy link

Feature Description

I think that Publii has a lot of resources that get buried in the noise of the forum and lost forever. I would really love to see a formal Publii approved Wiki that has three or four dedicated, well informed, courteous individuals promoted as admins for the better good of Publii.

Such a Wiki would be community driven and moderated by the small handful of trusted admins. Of course Tom and Bob would have ultimate authority over the whole, but the desire it to make it as hands off as possible for Tom and Bob but still provide curated information for the larger audience.

It would not and should not replace the community forum. It would not be a place for conversations about Publii - that must remain in the forum, but it might help forum members and new users find answers to common questions.

I imagine the wiki having five main sections:

  1. Frequently Asked Questions - here common issues that are asked over and over in the forum can be captured and answered once.
  2. Cookbook - here unique and innovative solutions and ideas around what can be done with Publii will be showcased.
  3. Themes - here user contributed themes that meet a basic standard of implementation can be highlighted.
  4. Plugins - same as themes - user contributed plugins that meet a basic standard of implementation would be highlighted here.
  5. Community Links - this would be a simple list of sites where community members host and provide additional Publii resources.

There is nothing stopping us from just implementing this, and I am very tempted to do just that, but I think that overall governance should come from the creators and maintainers of Publii so that they can:

  1. Link the site with confidence it will represent Publii accurately.
  2. Promote and demote administrators as needed

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant