Skip to content

Mismatch between Coveralls and Codecov coverage #289

Open
@akordowski

Description

@akordowski

The Coveralls coverage tag on the GRM project site shows a coverage of 34% for the develop branch.
The Codecov report on PRs shows a coverage over 77% for the develop branch.

It seems like in the Coveralls coverage the unit tests project were not excluded.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions