|
| 1 | +package config |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import ( |
| 4 | + "fmt" |
| 5 | + "github.com/icinga/icinga-notifications/internal/filter" |
| 6 | + "github.com/icinga/icinga-notifications/internal/rule" |
| 7 | + "github.com/stretchr/testify/require" |
| 8 | + "maps" |
| 9 | + "testing" |
| 10 | + "time" |
| 11 | +) |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +const defaultDivisor = 3 |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +func TestEvaluableConfig(t *testing.T) { |
| 16 | + t.Parallel() |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | + runtimeConfigTest := new(RuntimeConfig) |
| 19 | + runtimeConfigTest.Rules = make(map[int64]*rule.Rule) |
| 20 | + for i := 1; i <= 50; i++ { |
| 21 | + runtimeConfigTest.Rules[int64(i)] = makeRule(t, i) |
| 22 | + } |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | + t.Run("NewEvaluable", func(t *testing.T) { |
| 25 | + t.Parallel() |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | + e := NewEvaluable() |
| 28 | + require.NotNil(t, e, "it should create a fully initialised evaluable config") |
| 29 | + require.NotNil(t, e.Rules) |
| 30 | + require.NotNil(t, e.RuleEntries) |
| 31 | + }) |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + t.Run("EvaluateRules", func(t *testing.T) { |
| 34 | + t.Parallel() |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | + runtime := new(RuntimeConfig) |
| 37 | + runtime.Rules = maps.Clone(runtimeConfigTest.Rules) |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | + expectedLen := len(runtime.Rules) / defaultDivisor |
| 40 | + options := EvalOptions[*rule.Rule, any]{} |
| 41 | + e := NewEvaluable() |
| 42 | + assertRules := func(expectedLen *int, expectError bool) { |
| 43 | + if expectError { |
| 44 | + require.Error(t, e.EvaluateRules(runtime, new(filterableTest), options)) |
| 45 | + } else { |
| 46 | + require.NoError(t, e.EvaluateRules(runtime, new(filterableTest), options)) |
| 47 | + } |
| 48 | + require.Len(t, e.Rules, *expectedLen) |
| 49 | + } |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | + assertRules(&expectedLen, false) |
| 52 | + maps.DeleteFunc(e.Rules, func(ruleID int64, _ bool) bool { return int(ruleID) > expectedLen/2 }) |
| 53 | + |
| 54 | + options.OnPreEvaluate = func(r *rule.Rule) bool { |
| 55 | + require.Falsef(t, e.Rules[r.ID], "EvaluateRules() shouldn't evaluate %q twice", r.Name) |
| 56 | + return true |
| 57 | + } |
| 58 | + options.OnError = func(r *rule.Rule, err error) bool { |
| 59 | + require.EqualError(t, err, `"nonexistent" is not a valid filter key`) |
| 60 | + require.Truef(t, r.ID%defaultDivisor != 0, "evaluating rule %q should not fail", r.Name) |
| 61 | + return true |
| 62 | + } |
| 63 | + options.OnFilterMatch = func(r *rule.Rule) error { |
| 64 | + require.Falsef(t, e.Rules[r.ID], "EvaluateRules() shouldn't evaluate %q twice", r.Name) |
| 65 | + return nil |
| 66 | + } |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | + assertRules(&expectedLen, false) |
| 69 | + maps.DeleteFunc(e.Rules, func(ruleID int64, _ bool) bool { return int(ruleID) > expectedLen/2 }) |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | + lenBeforeError := new(int) |
| 72 | + options.OnError = func(r *rule.Rule, err error) bool { |
| 73 | + if *lenBeforeError != 0 { |
| 74 | + require.Fail(t, "OnError() shouldn't have been called again") |
| 75 | + } |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | + require.EqualError(t, err, `"nonexistent" is not a valid filter key`) |
| 78 | + require.Truef(t, r.ID%defaultDivisor != 0, "evaluating rule %q should not fail", r.Name) |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | + *lenBeforeError = len(e.Rules) |
| 81 | + return false // This should let the evaluation fail completely! |
| 82 | + } |
| 83 | + assertRules(lenBeforeError, true) |
| 84 | + maps.DeleteFunc(e.Rules, func(ruleID int64, _ bool) bool { return int(ruleID) > expectedLen/2 }) |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | + *lenBeforeError = 0 |
| 87 | + options.OnError = nil |
| 88 | + options.OnFilterMatch = func(r *rule.Rule) error { |
| 89 | + if *lenBeforeError != 0 { |
| 90 | + require.Fail(t, "OnFilterMatch() shouldn't have been called again") |
| 91 | + } |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | + *lenBeforeError = len(e.Rules) |
| 94 | + return fmt.Errorf("OnFilterMatch() failed badly") // This should let the evaluation fail completely! |
| 95 | + } |
| 96 | + assertRules(lenBeforeError, true) |
| 97 | + }) |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + t.Run("EvaluateRuleEntries", func(t *testing.T) { |
| 100 | + t.Parallel() |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | + runtime := new(RuntimeConfig) |
| 103 | + runtime.Rules = maps.Clone(runtimeConfigTest.Rules) |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | + e := NewEvaluable() |
| 106 | + options := EvalOptions[*rule.Entry, any]{} |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | + expectedLen := 0 |
| 109 | + filterContext := &rule.EscalationFilter{IncidentSeverity: 9} // Event severity "emergency" |
| 110 | + assertEntries := func(expectedLen *int, expectError bool) { |
| 111 | + if expectError { |
| 112 | + require.Error(t, e.EvaluateRuleEntries(runtime, filterContext, options)) |
| 113 | + } else { |
| 114 | + require.NoError(t, e.EvaluateRuleEntries(runtime, filterContext, options)) |
| 115 | + } |
| 116 | + require.Len(t, e.RuleEntries, *expectedLen) |
| 117 | + e.RuleEntries = make(map[int64]*rule.Entry) |
| 118 | + } |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | + assertEntries(&expectedLen, false) |
| 121 | + require.NoError(t, e.EvaluateRules(runtime, new(filterableTest), EvalOptions[*rule.Rule, any]{})) |
| 122 | + require.Len(t, e.Rules, len(runtime.Rules)/defaultDivisor) |
| 123 | + expectedLen = len(runtime.Rules)/defaultDivisor - 5 // 15/3 => (5) valid entries are going to be deleted below. |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | + // Drop some random rules from the runtime config to simulate a runtime config deletion! |
| 126 | + maps.DeleteFunc(runtime.Rules, func(ruleID int64, _ *rule.Rule) bool { return ruleID > 35 && ruleID%defaultDivisor == 0 }) |
| 127 | + |
| 128 | + options.OnPreEvaluate = func(re *rule.Entry) bool { |
| 129 | + if re.RuleID > 35 && re.RuleID%defaultDivisor == 0 { // Those rules are deleted from our runtime config. |
| 130 | + require.Failf(t, "OnPreEvaluate() shouldn't have been called", "rule %d was deleted from runtime config", re.RuleID) |
| 131 | + } |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | + require.Nilf(t, e.RuleEntries[re.ID], "EvaluateRuleEntries() shouldn't evaluate entry %d twice", re.ID) |
| 134 | + return true |
| 135 | + } |
| 136 | + options.OnError = func(re *rule.Entry, err error) bool { |
| 137 | + require.EqualError(t, err, `unknown severity "evaluable"`) |
| 138 | + require.Truef(t, re.RuleID%defaultDivisor == 0, "evaluating rule entry %d should not fail", re.ID) |
| 139 | + return true |
| 140 | + } |
| 141 | + options.OnFilterMatch = func(re *rule.Entry) error { |
| 142 | + require.Nilf(t, e.RuleEntries[re.ID], "OnPreEvaluate() shouldn't evaluate %d twice", re.ID) |
| 143 | + return nil |
| 144 | + } |
| 145 | + assertEntries(&expectedLen, false) |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | + lenBeforeError := new(int) |
| 148 | + options.OnError = func(re *rule.Entry, err error) bool { |
| 149 | + if *lenBeforeError != 0 { |
| 150 | + require.Fail(t, "OnError() shouldn't have been called again") |
| 151 | + } |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | + require.EqualError(t, err, `unknown severity "evaluable"`) |
| 154 | + require.Truef(t, re.RuleID%defaultDivisor == 0, "evaluating rule entry %d should not fail", re.ID) |
| 155 | + |
| 156 | + *lenBeforeError = len(e.RuleEntries) |
| 157 | + return false // This should let the evaluation fail completely! |
| 158 | + } |
| 159 | + assertEntries(lenBeforeError, true) |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | + *lenBeforeError = 0 |
| 162 | + options.OnError = nil |
| 163 | + options.OnFilterMatch = func(re *rule.Entry) error { |
| 164 | + if *lenBeforeError != 0 { |
| 165 | + require.Fail(t, "OnFilterMatch() shouldn't have been called again") |
| 166 | + } |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | + *lenBeforeError = len(e.RuleEntries) |
| 169 | + return fmt.Errorf("OnFilterMatch() failed badly") // This should let the evaluation fail completely! |
| 170 | + } |
| 171 | + assertEntries(lenBeforeError, true) |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | + expectedLen = 0 |
| 174 | + filterContext.IncidentSeverity = 1 // OK |
| 175 | + filterContext.IncidentAge = 5 * time.Minute |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | + options.OnFilterMatch = nil |
| 178 | + options.OnPreEvaluate = func(re *rule.Entry) bool { return re.RuleID < 5 } |
| 179 | + options.OnAllConfigEvaluated = func(result any) { |
| 180 | + retryAfter := result.(time.Duration) |
| 181 | + // The filter string of the escalation condition is incident_age>=10m and the actual incident age is 5m. |
| 182 | + require.Equal(t, 5*time.Minute, retryAfter) |
| 183 | + } |
| 184 | + assertEntries(&expectedLen, false) |
| 185 | + }) |
| 186 | +} |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +func makeRule(t *testing.T, i int) *rule.Rule { |
| 189 | + r := new(rule.Rule) |
| 190 | + r.ID = int64(i) |
| 191 | + r.Name = fmt.Sprintf("rule-%d", i) |
| 192 | + r.Entries = make(map[int64]*rule.Entry) |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | + invalidSeverity, err := filter.Parse("incident_severity=evaluable") |
| 195 | + require.NoError(t, err, "parsing incident_severity=evaluable shouldn't fail") |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | + redundant := new(rule.Entry) |
| 198 | + redundant.ID = r.ID * 150 // It must be large enough to avoid colliding with others! |
| 199 | + redundant.RuleID = r.ID |
| 200 | + redundant.Condition = invalidSeverity |
| 201 | + |
| 202 | + nonexistent, err := filter.Parse("nonexistent=evaluable") |
| 203 | + require.NoError(t, err, "parsing nonexistent=evaluable shouldn't fail") |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | + r.Entries[redundant.ID] = redundant |
| 206 | + r.ObjectFilter = nonexistent |
| 207 | + if i%defaultDivisor == 0 { |
| 208 | + objCond, err := filter.Parse("host=evaluable") |
| 209 | + require.NoError(t, err, "parsing host=evaluable shouldn't fail") |
| 210 | + |
| 211 | + escalationCond, err := filter.Parse("incident_severity>warning||incident_age>=10m") |
| 212 | + require.NoError(t, err, "parsing incident_severity>=ok shouldn't fail") |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | + entry := new(rule.Entry) |
| 215 | + entry.ID = r.ID * 2 |
| 216 | + entry.RuleID = r.ID |
| 217 | + entry.Condition = escalationCond |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | + r.ObjectFilter = objCond |
| 220 | + r.Entries[entry.ID] = entry |
| 221 | + } |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | + return r |
| 224 | +} |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +// filterableTest is a test type that simulates a filter evaluation and eliminates |
| 227 | +// the need of having to import e.g. the object package. |
| 228 | +type filterableTest struct{} |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +func (f *filterableTest) EvalEqual(k string, v string) (bool, error) { |
| 231 | + if k != "host" { |
| 232 | + return false, fmt.Errorf("%q is not a valid filter key", k) |
| 233 | + } |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | + return v == "evaluable", nil |
| 236 | +} |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +func (f *filterableTest) EvalExists(_ string) bool { return true } |
| 239 | +func (f *filterableTest) EvalLess(_ string, _ string) (bool, error) { |
| 240 | + panic("Oh dear - you shouldn't have called me") |
| 241 | +} |
| 242 | +func (f *filterableTest) EvalLike(_, _ string) (bool, error) { return f.EvalLess("", "") } |
| 243 | +func (f *filterableTest) EvalLessOrEqual(_, _ string) (bool, error) { return f.EvalLess("", "") } |
0 commit comments