Closed
Description
If it wouldn't cause the very foundations of the type system to crumble, it seems like it would be nice to be able to do this:
colorspace{C<:ColorValue,A<:AbstractArray{C}}(img::A) = string(C)
Use case: given an inheritance pattern
Image{T,N,A<:AbstractArray} <: AbstractImageIndexed{T,N} <: AbstractImage{T,N} <:AbstractArray{T,N}
this:
colorspace{C<:ColorValue}(img::AbstractArray{C}) = string(C)
has problems because methods like this:
colorspace(img::AbstractImage) = get(img.properties, "colorspace", "Unknown")
take precedence. One needs to use constructs like this:
colorspace{C<:ColorValue}(img::Union(Array{C},SubArray{C},Image{C})) = string(C)
Even this:
colorspace{C<:ColorValue}(img::Union(AbstractArray{C},AbstractImage{C})) = string(C)
fails to take precedence. But I have more concrete image types defined than just Image
, so it would be nice to have this work more generally without having to list all of them.
There's also an example in the FAQ that might benefit from this. In that case one could solve the problem using an inner constructor, but this type-chaining would have been more natural.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels