Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider which types should already been in scope for CXX-Qt bridges #1196

Open
ahayzen-kdab opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Consider which types should already been in scope for CXX-Qt bridges #1196

ahayzen-kdab opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
🤔 discussion Feedback welcome

Comments

@ahayzen-kdab
Copy link
Collaborator

As part of #1159 QObject becomes a type automatically added to all bridges. Should we consider others like ConnectionType that are in CXX-Qt ? And should we allow for a cxx-qt-lib prelude way to add them too ? (which would be #287 )
@ahayzen-kdab ahayzen-kdab added the 🤔 discussion Feedback welcome label Feb 21, 2025
@ahayzen-kdab ahayzen-kdab mentioned this issue Feb 21, 2025
Merged
@LeonMatthesKDAB
Copy link
Collaborator

Note: #1159 currently adds QObject to the bridge only if needed.
We should also decide whether we should add it unconditionally or not, as currently you can still declare a type to be named QObject if it's not needed by inheritance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🤔 discussion Feedback welcome
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@LeonMatthesKDAB @ahayzen-kdab