Any opinions on hyperparameter tuning? #2449
powerhorse1986
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
It really depends on your specific use case and what you attempt to achieve. I would advise trying out some of the hyperparameters first yourself to get a feeling of what works and what doesn't. Especially with something that is so use case specific, I would argue focusing on manual tweaking first and aligning that with the use case / stakeholder(s). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, dear BERTopic fans,
Our group is planning a project that aims to fine-tune the hyperparameters of UMAP and HDBSCAN. However, there are too many hyperparameters. For UMAP, there are n_neighbors, n_components, min_dist, and metric. For HDBSCAN, we have min_cluster_size, min_samples, metric, and prediction_data. Do you have any recommended strategies other than the classic grid search? Thank you so much.
Li
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions