[NuGet.org Bug]: Universal-FOSS-exception-1.0 license missing

[fjssilva]

Impact

It's more difficult to complete my work

Describe the bug

License identifier 'Universal-FOSS-exception-1.0' is an approved SPDX license exception identifier but the corresponding license text cannot be found in licences.nuget.org/Universal-FOSS-exception-1.0. Can you please add it?

Repro Steps

Open the link https://licenses.nuget.org/Universal-FOSS-exception-1.0

Expected Behavior

The link above is expected to show the contents of the Universal FOSS exception 1.0 license text, same as in https://spdx.org/licenses/Universal-FOSS-exception-1.0.html.

Screenshots

No response

Additional Context and logs

This is currently breaking the licencing information in MySQL Connector/NET NuGet packages

[erdembayar]

@fjssilva
Thank you for filing this issue. Could you please add this license to here?
https://github.com/NuGet/NuGet.Licenses/tree/main/src/NuGet.Licenses/App_Data/Licenses

[fjssilva]

@erdembayar
I just did in PR #54, however I'm being asked to agree with .NET Foundation CLA, which I can't without involving my company's Legal team and I'm afraid that may take a while. I have to ask, can you do it yourself? If you accept to do it, the fix is pretty simple: you just have to fix the script src/NuGet.Licenses/license-text-extractor.ps1 like this and run it.

[lyndaidaii]

@fjssilva, thank you for your feedback. We are currently working on this. Will get back to you once we get decision from legal team.

[fjssilva]

@lyndaidaii, the PR is finished and reviewed but stuck on the CLA issue. Can you please confirm if the PR can be accepted as-is? Or whether your are willing to reproduce the fix yourselves?
Thanks.

[lyndaidaii]

@agr is currently active looking into your PR.

[fjssilva]

Yes he is, and he's the one who approved the PR, however, his last comment was "@fjssilva, you'd need to NuGet/NuGet.Licenses#54 (comment) to CLA in order for this PR to be unblocked for merging."

My question is whether there's a way of skipping the CLA, for all the reasons I already explained. IIUC, two weeks ago you said something about checking with legal. Are there any news regarding this?

[erdembayar]

Yes he is, and he's the one who approved the PR, however, his last comment was "@fjssilva, you'd need to NuGet/NuGet.Licenses#54 (comment) to CLA in order for this PR to be unblocked for merging."

My question is whether there's a way of skipping the CLA, for all the reasons I already explained. IIUC, two weeks ago you said something about checking with legal. Are there any news regarding this?

@agr 's comment was about below CLA: