Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Being able to focus only on error or audit messages #1526

Open
DCollart opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Being able to focus only on error or audit messages #1526

DCollart opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@DCollart
Copy link

Describe the feature.

Is your feature related to a problem? Please describe.

That would solve the problem I just documented : #1525
But it's not the main point.

Describe the requested feature

That would be great to have a way to get only audit or only error messages.

I had to investigate some errors but since audit messages are always loaded (and we have way more audit messages than error messages) it really slow down any operation (search/paging/ordering).

I tried ordering on status but... If I order "ascending" I get the successful first (not useful).
image
If I order "descending" I see the errors for a second then they are replaced by the "successful after retries"
image

And even if ordering was OK, since it's not possible to order on multiple columns it's not usable.

Having a way to specify I only want to deal with error/audit messages would be great and probably way faster (we usually have way less error messages than audit messages).

Describe alternatives you've considered

I checked directly in the API, but that's pity.

Additional Context

No response

@TravisNickels
Copy link
Member

@DCollart - Thanks for this and your other suggested improvements (#1527 and #1528). We'll review your requests on the next round of enhancements for ServiceInsight.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants