Skip to content

V4 I2C cleanup opportunity: Let's add default implementations for the register methods in I2c that don't already have one #522

Description

@stefanhaustein

As far as I understand, registers are just common conventions -- they are not actually reflected in the protocol.

So we could just add default implementations, and providers wouldn't need to implement register support, reducing opportunities for unexpected differences or errors.

I am happy to create a PR to implement this if people agree that we should do this.

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions