Skip to content

Conversation

@Alex-PLACET
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET self-assigned this Nov 10, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 10, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 79.66102% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@f630a81). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/deserialize.cpp 68.42% 12 Missing ⚠️
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #60   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   82.49%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       36           
  Lines           ?     1771           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1461           
  Misses          ?      310           
  Partials        ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 82.49% <79.66%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 13:31
@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET requested review from Hind-M and JohanMabille and removed request for Hind-M and JohanMabille December 8, 2025 12:08
namespace sparrow_ipc
{
template <typename T>
[[nodiscard]] sparrow::interval_array<T> deserialize_non_owning_interval_array(
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems this function is exactly the same (except from data type) as the one used in primitive_array, so we should probably refactor and use some generic function.

const std::string name = field->name() == nullptr ? "" : field->name()->str();
const bool nullable = field->nullable();
const auto field_type = field->type_type();
// TODO rename all the deserialize_non_owning... fcts since this is not correct anymore
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why remove this? This is actually still relevant as we are using now optionally_owned_buffer (which is not necessarily non owning as the functions names suggest).

@Hind-M
Copy link
Member

Hind-M commented Dec 9, 2025

Should this be linked to the corresponding issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants