forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 443
Commit a216542
btrfs: fix lockdep splat while merging a relocation root
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we
can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call
against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at
ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent
buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to
the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a
relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a
relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used
to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap
extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()).
However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset
the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock
an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit
b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers").
So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the
attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search().
The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374
__lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline]
lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870
up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629
btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660
btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755
btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153
replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
__btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693
btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline]
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132
btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573
btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755
btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153
btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351
btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline]
btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330
btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline]
btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374
vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067
do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224
__do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline]
__se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline]
__x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649
btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline]
read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610
btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237
replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
__btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1);
lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1);
rlock(btrfs-tree-01);
*** DEADLOCK ***
8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335:
#0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559
#1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183
#2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086
#3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659
#4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
#5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
#6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
#7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
__lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649
btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline]
read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610
btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237
replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
__btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29
Code: ff ff c3 (...)
RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29
RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007
RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88
</TASK>
Reported-by: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/
Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>1 parent 9d0c23d commit a216542Copy full SHA for a216542
1 file changed
+2
-0
lines changed+2
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
1496 | 1496 |
| |
1497 | 1497 |
| |
1498 | 1498 |
| |
| 1499 | + | |
1499 | 1500 |
| |
1500 | 1501 |
| |
1501 | 1502 |
| |
| |||
1539 | 1540 |
| |
1540 | 1541 |
| |
1541 | 1542 |
| |
| 1543 | + | |
1542 | 1544 |
| |
1543 | 1545 |
| |
1544 | 1546 |
| |
|
0 commit comments