Description
Perhaps I'm missing something, but can't see how the implementation of the Route53 entries honours the site_prefix
variable.
The www
record is not taking the site_prefix
variable https://github.com/TechToSpeech/terraform-aws-serverless-static-wordpress/blob/master/r53.tf#L3.
Also the apex
record will always manage the apex record, which may not be the desired outcome.
On my scenario, i have got an existing website with an already set www
and apex
records which i don't want to change. I want an additional recordset to test this module that would run in parallel with the existing website.
Woudn't it make more sense for this module to only manage the recordset defined and in site_prefix
and give the users the flexibility of managing their apex
and www
records differently?
That could also help address #43, by giving users the possibility of setting the non-canonical address to another endpoint which would handle the redirect.