A Couple of Questions on Reverse PTR Records #1832
-
|
I'm in the process of attempting to add some reverse-lookup functionality to my local Zone... and I'm seeing some odd results likely the result of misunderstanding on my part. I'd be very grateful for anyone able to offer any advice on the following. First Question - Reverse Zone Creation... https://www.reddit.com/r/technitium/comments/1n0la3d/add_hostnames_to_static_ips/ and given my network range I tried to manually add a Zone on my Primary DNS, using 0.0.16.172.in-addr.arpa ... I then tried to add PTR records to that zone - which Technitium lets me do... but when I went back to my Dashboard and looked at the "Top Clients" table, they were still showing just IP addresses, not my local domain names. So I went back to my existing Zone, chose the A record for a highly active host and selected "Edit". I then activated the two radio-button options, "Update reverse (PTR) record" and "Create reverse zone for PTR record" and clicked "Save". This time, when I went back to my Dashboard and looked at "Top Clients", I can now see the FQDN for each of the top 10 active hosts - which is exactly what I wanted... But something else and unexpected has happened... When I select the "Zones" tab, I now find that I have multiple new Primary Zones created by my changes ... such as 1.16.172.in-addr.arpa, 101.16.172.in-addr.arpa and 104.16-172.in-addr.arpa. The first part of my first question is: given that I'm trying to operate a flat Class B network here, why has the "Create reverse zone for PTR record" option in the A Record details created a whole set of Zones? Obviously I've done something wrong here, but if I follow through what has happened, should I not expect to see a Primary [reverse lookup] Zone of "16.172.in-addr.arpa" and then, within that, a set of PTR records with the Name field set to e,g, "104.1", "103.1 and "1.1"? The second part of my first question, closely related to the above is: how should I go about trying to tidy this up? Second Question - Replication But there are no guidance notes for replicating a Reverse Lookup Zone anywhere... Does this mean that the same principles apply:-
If it helps... I think my biggest concern right know is the appearance of all the new "ip-addr.arpa" Zones on my Primary instance. It doesn't feel right and so I think I should probably try and sort that before I attempt replication. But any advice on either of these questions would be very much appreciated. Thanks in advance. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
|
Thanks for asking.
The zone name should have been When you use the option to add/update PTR record when adding/updating A/AAAA records, the DNS server will try to find out any existing reverse zone to add PTR records to. But since you had
The reverse zones are nothing special and work the same way. So, you have to configure secondary zones for them the exact same way. I would recommend that you setup Catalog zone so that you can easily provision secondary zones by just adding the primary zone as the member of catalog zone. You can read more about it in this blog post. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thanks for asking.
The zone name should have been
16.172.in-addr.arpainstead and the PTR records in there should have the rest of the two numbers in the name field.When you use the option to add/update PTR record when adding/updating A/AAAA records, the DNS server will try to find out any existing reverse zone to add PTR records to. But since you had
0.0.16.172.in-addr.arpazone instead of16.172.in-addr.arpa, it did not match and thus the DNS server created a reverse zone for /24 subnet for the PTR records.The reverse zones are nothing special and wo…