Support reply into webhook for less api calls

[akarsh1995]

It helps to reduce the api calls hence less overhead.

Check code for reference in aiogram webhook example: https://github.com/aiogram/aiogram/blob/dea94d2574893f4d0e7df358852a543ef9214217/examples/webhook_example.py#L34

More description can be found here: telegram-bot-rb/telegram-bot#59 (comment)

[Tishka17]

It is difficult to implement, because we beed to know if message is updated correctly and resend in case if errors.

[akarsh1995]

Let's consider it's the developer's call, is it possible to implement it ?

[Tishka17]

The main difficulty is that we cannot store message id to edit it infuture if we send it in such manner. Probably this will not be implemented

[qlibp]

So, webhook is not yet supported by this framework, right?

[Tishka17]

Webhook is supported. Unsupported webhook response with action

[qlibp]

Webhook is supported. Unsupported webhook response with action

what webhook response with action means? I try inputtextmessage with state transition, but the state seems not updated. If this should work, could you please give me an example? The documentation doesn’t have a webhook example