Is it possible to configure inheritance for children templates in a tree, but not for implementations of the said templates

[diyoyo]

Basically, my goal was to clean my tree a little bit, and group templates into template types. (please remember this, as this is the real problem, not the one I created myself below).

Solution 1: group the templates in an intermediate branch note with the given template type as title

|-> Templates
    |_ Dev
        |_ Feature Request
        |_ Linux Tip
    |_ Entertainment
        |_ Movie
        |_ Exhibit
    |_ ....

⇒ Problem : Doing so, I lost alphabetical sorting when assigning a new note to its template 😵‍💫

Solution 2: Creating an inheritable label in note Templates

Problem : all the implementations of this template will inherit the label too, but templateType is an information that should only belong to a template, not its implementations.

So, two questions:

• is there an existing configuration that would meet my needs?
• if not, would it make sense to think of a future feature where inheritance and templates are two different things.

(truth is, coming from Java, I even split templates into two types: Classes, that really build something new, like a Person, a City, etc., and Interfaces, a toolbox of recurrent building blocks that can be reused here and there in different templates, like 'advanced tags', generic child/parent relationships, contact information, etc.)

[diyoyo]

I guess a solution to my real problem would be to have a way to declare the sorting behavior of templates :

• Option 1: Hierarchical alphabetical order (currently implemented), meaning that 1st generation is sorted before the second generation, resulting in non alphabetical order in the final, flattened list of templates
• Option 2: Forced Alphabetical.