Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pkg(scope): Seedvault shouldn't be marked as recommended #845

Open
3 tasks done
lucasmz-dev opened this issue Feb 8, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
3 tasks done

pkg(scope): Seedvault shouldn't be marked as recommended #845

lucasmz-dev opened this issue Feb 8, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
package::documentation Improve a description/recommendation

Comments

@lucasmz-dev
Copy link

List your packages

  • Package name: com.stevesoltys.seedvault
  • Current list: OEM
    • Proposed list: OEM
  • Current removal: Recommended
    • Proposed removal: Advanced
  • Current description: Running in the background.
    it's app for Backup, Restore your data.
    • Proposed description: Open source component for custom ROMs for backuping up apps (and files) with Android's internal backup APIs, useful but should be safe to remove, there aren't other rootless backup tools, does not run in the background unless the user uses it

Acknowledgements

  • This issue is not a duplicate of an existing one.
  • I have chosen an appropriate title.
  • All requested information has been provided properly.
@lucasmz-dev lucasmz-dev added the package::documentation Improve a description/recommendation label Feb 8, 2025
@lucasmz-dev
Copy link
Author

When I downloaded a debug build it was like 4MB, as well as just not running in the background as far as I can tell, so this shouldn't be recommended, given there are no good alternatives that are rootless, and it's really getting better recently

Note: GrapheneOS may use a different package name IIRC, I don't use it though but it should be easy to find

@AnonymousWP AnonymousWP self-assigned this Feb 8, 2025
@codenyte
Copy link
Contributor

codenyte commented Feb 8, 2025

GrapheneOS may use a different package name IIRC

Just checked, they use the same package name

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
package::documentation Improve a description/recommendation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants