Skip to content

[Security]: AI-Assisted Security Review (Tooling + LLM) #67

@DenizAltunkapan

Description

@DenizAltunkapan

Run a structured security review using automated tools and LLM-based analysis to identify potential vulnerabilities and document them.

Scope

  • Static code analysis
  • Dependency vulnerabilities
  • Authentication / authorization flows
  • Input validation and data handling
  • Basic runtime / API checks

Guidelines

  • Only create issues for:
    • confirmed vulnerabilities
    • or clearly actionable risks
  • Avoid duplicates (check existing issues first)
  • Group minor findings into a single issue
  • Tag findings with severity and confidence if possible

Tools (suggested)

  • Semgrep (static analysis)
  • Dependabot / Snyk (dependencies)
  • Trivy (container + dependencies)
  • OWASP ZAP (runtime / API)
  • LLM-based review (Claude / OpenAI) for logic & architecture

Outcome

  • Structured list of findings
  • Minimal, high-quality follow-up issues
  • Improved documentation of known risks

Note

This is a mid-development review, not a final security audit.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentationenhancementNew feature or requestsecurity

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions