ReactComponent instead of "Component2" ?

[shivamkaushik14]

I discovered this package recently and have been enjoying it a lot. One thing that I think doesn't make sense to me is the name of the class "Component2". Won't "ReactComponent" be a more descriptive name for it?
Component2 just feels arbitrary

[kealjones-wk]

We used to have a class called Component that was deprecated. Component2 is just the next evolution of that. It changed the underlying props/state from dart maps to "js-backed" maps, this made it possible to use the react devtools! It also added support for lots of the stuff in React 16. The underlying props/state change was a breaking change hence the 2.

[mcmah309]

At this point, I think it makes sense to remove the original ‘Component’, rename ‘Component2’ to ‘Component’, and add ‘Component2’ as a typedef of ‘Component’