Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes, I agree that this is an important feature. Especially as the README clearly states:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In reference to #643 started by @dotancohen
I think overall it will be good to have such compatibility.
One related issue is that an RFC 4180 compliant parser may also require RFC 4180 compliant data to parse. That is not always the case with every csv file.
I suppose it could be possible to fall back on the current (or another) parser if there were such an issue.
Anyway I managed to find this:
https://github.com/birendpatel/CSV-Parser
I don't know if it is completely suitable.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions