-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bug] Docker signal handling not working #13498
Comments
Hi, this is your first issue in IoTDB project. Thanks for your report. Welcome to join the community! |
Is there no problem with the logic here
|
This is the code snippet from apache/iotdb:1.3.2-standalone image. In apache/iotdb:1.3.1-standalone it is
Also the main problem of using |
Actually, an elegant shutdown only requires calling the stop script.
This operation is just a guarantee mechanism, and after calling the stop script, the program will also perform corresponding elegant shutdown processing internally |
Search before asking
Version
iotdb 1.3.1-standalone
Describe the bug and provide the minimal reproduce step
When stoping a docker container running the apache/iotdb:1.3.1-standalone image the SIGTERM signal handling trap is not executed leading to a non graceful shut down. This is because the entrypoint.sh script uses
exec
which destroys signal handlers usingtrap.
Furthermore, the function that should be executed at SIGTERM 'on_stop' defined in entrypoint.sh has the if statement
"$start_what"
!= "all".` Therfore in standalone mode the corresponding graceful shutdown is not executed.To reproduce run the docker container and then stop it.
What did you expect to see?
The on_stop function defined in entrypoint.sh is executed when the docker container is stopped providing a graceful shutdown with FLUSH.
What did you see instead?
Rapid shut down without proper SIGNAL handling and without execution of the on_stop function.
Anything else?
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: