forked from happypoulp/redux-tutorial
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
05_get-state.js
110 lines (83 loc) · 4.98 KB
/
05_get-state.js
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
// Tutorial 5 - get-state.js
// How do we retrieve the state from our Redux instance?
import { createStore } from 'redux'
var reducer_0 = function (state, action) {
console.log('reducer_0 was called with state', state, 'and action', action)
}
var store_0 = createStore(reducer_0)
// Output: reducer_0 was called with state undefined and action { type: '@@redux/INIT' }
// To get the state that Redux is holding for us, you call getState
console.log('store_0 state after initialization:', store_0.getState())
// Output: Redux state after initialization: undefined
// So the state of our application is still undefined after the initialization? Well of course it is,
// our reducer is not doing anything... Remember how we described the expected behavior of reducer in
// "about-state-and-meet-redux"?
// "A reducer is just a function that receives the current state of your application, the action,
// and returns a new state modified (or reduced as they call it)"
// Our reducer is not returning anything right now so the state of our application is what
// reducer() returns, hence "undefined".
// Let's try to send an initial state of our application if the state given to reducer is undefined:
var reducer_1 = function (state, action) {
console.log('reducer_1 was called with state', state, 'and action', action)
if (typeof state === 'undefined') {
return {}
}
return state;
}
var store_1 = createStore(reducer_1)
// Output: reducer_1 was called with state undefined and action { type: '@@redux/INIT' }
console.log('store_1 state after initialization:', store_1.getState())
// Output: Redux state after initialization: {}
// As expected, the state returned by Redux after initialization is now {}
// There is however a much cleaner way to implement this pattern thanks to ES6:
var reducer_2 = function (state = {}, action) {
console.log('reducer_2 was called with state', state, 'and action', action)
return state;
}
var store_2 = createStore(reducer_2)
// Output: reducer_2 was called with state {} and action { type: '@@redux/INIT' }
console.log('store_2 state after initialization:', store_2.getState())
// Output: Redux state after initialization: {}
// You've probably noticed that since we've used the default parameter on state parameter of reducer_2,
// we no longer get undefined as state's value in our reducer's body.
// Let's now recall that a reducer is only called in response to an action dispatched and
// let's fake a state modification in response to an action type 'SAY_SOMETHING'
var reducer_3 = function (state = {}, action) {
console.log('reducer_3 was called with state', state, 'and action', action)
switch (action.type) {
case 'SAY_SOMETHING':
return {
...state,
message: action.value
}
default:
return state;
}
}
var store_3 = createStore(reducer_3)
// Output: reducer_3 was called with state {} and action { type: '@@redux/INIT' }
console.log('redux state after initialization:', store_3.getState())
// Output: Redux state after initialization: {}
// Nothing new in our state so far since we did not dispatch any action yet. But there are few
// important things to pay attention to in the last example:
// 0) I assumed that our action contains a type and a value property. type property is mostly
// a convention in flux actions and the value property could have been anything else.
// 1) You'll see a lot the pattern involving a switch to respond accordingly
// to an action received in your reducers
// 2) When using a switch, NEVER forget to have a "default: return state" because
// if you don't, you'll end up having your reducer return undefined (hence loosing your state).
// 3) Notice how we returned a new state made by merging current state with { message: action.value },
// all that thanks to this awesome ES7 notation (Object Spread): { ...state, message: action.value }
// 4) Note also that this ES7 Object Spread notation suits our example because it's doing a shallow
// copy of { message: action.value } over our state (meaning that first level property of state
// are completely overwritten - by opposition to gracefully merged - by first level property of
// { message: action.value }). But if we had a more complex / nested data structure, you may choose
// to handle your state's updates very differently:
// - using Immutable.js (https://facebook.github.io/immutable-js/)
// - using Object.assign (https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object/assign)
// - using manual merge
// - or whatever other strategy that suits your needs and the structure of your state since
// Redux is absolutely NOT opiniated on this (remember, Redux is a state container).
// Now that we're starting to handle actions in our reducer let's speak about having multiple reducers and
// combining them.
// Go to next tutorial: combine-reducers.js