SQS - Support for virtual queues?

[tom-sherman]

I'm not actually sure if this is supported? It's not clear from the documentation

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Implementing a request/response pattern in SQS

Describe the solution you'd like

Virtual temporary queues as described here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSSimpleQueueService/latest/SQSDeveloperGuide/sqs-temporary-queues.html

Describe alternatives you've considered

Implementing it ourselves on top of the SQS client

Additional context

None

[tom-sherman]

Relevant: awslabs/amazon-sqs-java-temporary-queues-client#15

[miekassu]

+1 for this feature

[kitsunde]

This would significantly simplify situations where we need to throughput limit things in an already deployed system that's expecting synchronous execution to happen, without having to move in more complex logic or re-architecture flows.

I hope this can get more attention.

[aBurmeseDev]

Hey all - apology for the long silence here. This's something that needs to be implemented on service level by SQS rather than SDK. I'm going to submit an internal request to service team and will post when I hear back. (ref: V1394603877)

Can you all please provide the details in your use case and some examples so that service can use it as reference?

[tom-sherman]

Why does it require work on the service level when temporary queues are already available to use with the Java SDK?

I have a use case described here: https://tom-sherman.com/blog/serverless-xstate

[aBurmeseDev]

@tom-sherman - thanks for the response.

Upon communicating with SQS team, they've confirmed that https://github.com/awslabs/amazon-sqs-java-temporary-queues-client is developed/owned by SQS team and similar implementation for Node is not currently prioritized on their roadmap.

Since it's out of SDK control, I'm going to close it for now.

[github-actions]

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs and link to relevant comments in this thread.