-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
batch size #4
Comments
batchsize is 64. 8 is the number of classification in a batchsize.
…---- Replied Message ----
| From | ***@***.***> |
| Date | 10/11/2024 16:15 |
| To | ***@***.***> |
| Cc | ***@***.***> |
| Subject | [chenjingong/DN-ReID] batch size (Issue #4) |
Hello, I used your code with a batch size of 8 during the training process, but the test results are slightly lower than those reported in your paper. May I ask if you trained with a batch size of 8 or 64?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
parser.add_argument('--batch-size', default=8, type=int, metavar='B', help='training batch size') Is switching the batch size to 64 sufficient, or do I need to make other modifications as well? |
I think you can use the code directly after you change the datepath
…---- Replied Message ----
| From | ***@***.***> |
| Date | 10/11/2024 16:27 |
| To | ***@***.***> |
| Cc | ***@***.***>***@***.***> |
| Subject | Re: [chenjingong/DN-ReID] batch size (Issue #4) |
Is switching the batch size to 64 sufficient, or do I need to make other modifications as well?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello, I used your code with a batch size of 8 during the training process, but the test results are slightly lower than those reported in your paper. May I ask if you trained with a batch size of 8 or 64?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: