You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I continually use ML with satisfaction for face normalization.
It helps me a lot to rearrange the drawn meshes quickly.
Unfortunately it is not useful to me in attempts to decimate or reconstruct the mesh.
All the processing I have tried is dangerous because it produces holes and intersections between faces.
It is a dangerous situation because it produces damage that is often hidden if you act on carefully constructed meshes at a great expense of time.
I think it is appropriate to review the source bugs, or, at least, add a warning on the effects of these operations.
Personally, I have not found any functions in these menu items that did not produce errors. Please let us know if you have a different opinion.
But I wonder, is it useful to have so many inconsistent features? Wouldn't it be better to reduce them and ensure their correctness?
Thanks!
G.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GiovanniSer
changed the title
Remeshing, simlification.. etc ... items failures
Remeshing, simplification.. etc ... items failures
Feb 8, 2025
Perhaps it may be useful for someone to know that the operation
Edge Collapse for Marching Cube Meshes
differently from other decimations, does not generate artifacts in the mesh, and after many tests I verified that it is a safe procedure.
In contrast, the other simplifications items, with reduction of faces, are always accompanied by errors.
I continually use ML with satisfaction for face normalization.
It helps me a lot to rearrange the drawn meshes quickly.
Unfortunately it is not useful to me in attempts to decimate or reconstruct the mesh.
All the processing I have tried is dangerous because it produces holes and intersections between faces.
It is a dangerous situation because it produces damage that is often hidden if you act on carefully constructed meshes at a great expense of time.
I think it is appropriate to review the source bugs, or, at least, add a warning on the effects of these operations.
Personally, I have not found any functions in these menu items that did not produce errors. Please let us know if you have a different opinion.
But I wonder, is it useful to have so many inconsistent features? Wouldn't it be better to reduce them and ensure their correctness?
Thanks!
G.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: