We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We (I and @gsomix) have came to conclusion that it'll be better to use the following format for the method definitions in Naggum.Assembler:
(.method (name arguments returnType ?metadata) &body)
So we could turn the metadata to an optional argument. @gsomix said that it reminds him Scheme procedure definition syntax.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe syntax for the call instruction should be also changed to mirror the definition syntax. Consider something like the following:
call
(call (mscorlib System.Console (WriteLine (System.Int32) System.Void)))
i.e. (call (<assembly> <type> (<method> <arguments> <returnType>))).
(call (<assembly> <type> (<method> <arguments> <returnType>)))
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
We (I and @gsomix) have came to conclusion that it'll be better to use the following format for the method definitions in Naggum.Assembler:
So we could turn the metadata to an optional argument. @gsomix said that it reminds him Scheme procedure definition syntax.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: