Remove `--no-deps --no-build-isolation` flags from pure-Python package example recipe?

[matthewfeickert]

Given discussion with @xhochy and @ocefpaf in #2864 (comment), should the --no-deps --no-build-isolation flags be removed from

conda-forge.github.io/docs/maintainer/example_recipes/pure-python.md

Line 39 in a69afa4

script: ${{ PYTHON }} -m pip install . -vv --no-deps --no-build-isolation

in the pure-Python package example recipe given that the example recipe is in the v1 / rattler-build format (and it has been noted that inclusion of these flags is redundant)?

This also applies to

conda-forge.github.io/docs/tutorials/first-recipe.md

Line 125 in a69afa4

script: ${{ PYTHON }} -m pip install . -vv --no-deps --no-build-isolation

in https://conda-forge.org/docs/tutorials/first-recipe/#look-at-the-recipe-file

[jaimergp]

This was addressed in conda-build 24.7.0 I believe? https://github.com/conda/conda-build/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#2470-2024-07-18

@isuruf fixed it via conda/conda-build#5368

[matthewfeickert]

Thanks @jaimergp. It seems that does look like between conda/conda-build#5368 and https://github.com/conda/conda-build/blob/a714753daf650ef0a3bccf6a4f53b0be533ef4f0/conda_build/build.py#L3045-L3061 that should be covered now, and so this issue's question could be resolved to "yes, remove them."

@ocefpaf mentioned in #2864 (comment)

This fails only on multiple outputs and conda-build as far as I know. That is where my recommendation comes from. If we ditch v0, and rattler-build multiple outputs does suffer from that.

Are multiple outputs fully covered by conda-build? If so, we can drop the --no-deps --no-build-isolation recommendations from everywhere.