-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Security Audit #7
Comments
Here's the output of one run of the statistical test. This establishes that there is probably no simple bias (one character being more likely than another, independent of position or other characters) larger than 1 part in 10,000 (TODO: Calculate the actual probability of their being a bias and it not being detected). Edit: In case it changes in the future, the SD_THRESHOLD was 3.5.
|
The statistical test on the word generator failed, but I think it's just random error. I don't think this testing methodology is that great for a "character set" of this size -- it needs a MASSIVE number of samples. Let's find a faster way to test it. Full output here:
|
I think I've found all the possible problems that I can... maybe it's worth paying someone else to have another look? |
Do you have an estimate on how much would an audit of passgen cost? |
I'm not sure. There's not much code so I'd guess about 10 hours or about $2500-$3000 for a good one. I don't think it's popular enough to warrant spending money on yet, if it starts to be more widely used I'll look at crowdfunding or something. |
Do a 'formal' security audit of the code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: