DST Staging Review: Guidance unclear on when to use indeterminate vs. checkbox group #3805
Labels
accessibility
Any Section 508 or accessibility issue
checkbox
collab-cycle-feedback
Comprehension
design
DS-Staging-Review
exp-std-task-completion
guidance
IA
platform-design-system-team
staging
Need help? Please review how to read a Staging Review ticket. Tag
@platform-governance-team-members
on Slack if you need further assistance.Design System Staging Information
Component: checkbox
Staging Review ticket: Design System Staging Review: Checkbox indeterminate state
Findings details
VA.gov Experience Standard - issue: User has enough information to complete a task.
VA.gov Experience Standard - category: Comprehension
This is an issue with the: guidance
High-priority: No
Collab Cycle Reviewer: @erinrwhite (IA), @briandeconinck (Accessibility), @allison0034 (Design)
Description
It's not clear to me when the indeterminate state might be used instead of a regular ol' checkbox group component. The guidance isn't super clear on this. Is this when a list of options is larger than a certain number? Is this when we want people to be able to select all/deselect all easily? I also wonder if the example text itself might be updated with a real potential use-case on VA.gov rather than example data. There's no accompanying component in USWDS so more detail would be helpful here.
The guidance also directs you to the mutually exclusive answer pattern, seems to advise against using the indeterminate state for that pattern. Linking to that pattern with so little supporting guidance is likely to cause confusion around when it is an appropriate choice.
Recommended action
Add more documentation in the guidance...
References
Next Steps for DST
high-priority
label, please address as soon as possible so VFS teams are not impactedconsider
label, please consider for future implementationThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: