Merge pull request oasis-tcs#590 from keberlein/review-g-comments

Review G editorial work

Author: keberlein

specification/dita-2.0-specification-subjectScheme.ditamap

@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
     <subjectdef keys="review-c"/>
     <subjectdef keys="review-d"/>
     <subjectdef keys="review-e"/>
+    <subjectdef keys="review-g"/>
     <subjectdef keys="review-1"/>
     <subjectdef keys="2.0"/>
     <subjectdef keys="tc-review"/>

specification/langRef/base/keywords.dita

@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
  "reference.dtd">
 <reference id="keywords" xml:lang="en-us">
  <title><xmlelement>keywords</xmlelement></title>
- <shortdesc>Key words are terms that applies to the topic or
-    map.</shortdesc>
+ <shortdesc>Key words are terms that <ph rev="review-g">apply</ph> to the
+    topic or map.</shortdesc>
  <prolog>
   <metadata>
    <keywords>

specification/langRef/base/othermeta.dita

@@ -13,16 +13,7 @@
   </metadata>
  </prolog>
  <refbody>
-  <section id="processing-expectations">
-   <title>Processing expectations</title>
-      <draft-comment author="Kristen J Eberlein" time="10 January 2022">
-        <p>Should we simply remove the "Processing expectations" section? I
-          don't think it is necessary.</p>
-      </draft-comment>
-   <p>All <xmlelement>othermeta</xmlelement> elements are considered part
-        of the topic metadata and should be reflected in the output as
-        appropriate for the output medium.</p>
-  </section>
+    <!--<section id="processing-expectations"><title>Processing expectations</title><draft-comment author="Kristen J Eberlein" time="10 January 2022"><p>Should we simply remove the "Processing expectations" section? I don't think it is necessary.</p></draft-comment><p>All <xmlelement>othermeta</xmlelement> elements are considered part of the topic metadata and should be reflected in the output as appropriate for the output medium.</p></section>-->
   <section id="attributes">
    <title>Attributes</title>
    <p>The following attributes are available on this element: <ph conkeyref="reuse-attributes/ref-universalatts"/> and the attributes defined below.</p>

specification/langRef/base/vrm.dita

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  "reference.dtd">
 <reference id="vrm" xml:lang="en-us">
 <title><xmlelement>vrm</xmlelement></title>
-<shortdesc>A <xmlelement>vrm</xmlelement> element that can be used for
+<shortdesc>A <xmlelement>vrm</xmlelement> element can be used for
     specifying the version, release, and modification information for a
     products.</shortdesc>
 <prolog><metadata>