Adopt SLF4J instead of Java Util Logging #91
ThomasVitale
started this conversation in
Design Discussions
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I thought about this (albeit very briefly) when I was building things. I decided on java.util.logging just because I didn't want to introduce any additional dependencies. But I'm ok either way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@edeandrea @lordofthejars just thinking about whether we should adopt SLF4J in the project. I realised now we are using Java Util Logging.
Personally, I'm fine either way. But from a contribution perspective, SLF4J is more broadly used in Java libraries so it might be more familiar to contributors. For example, LangChain4j uses SLF4J as well.
What do you think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions