Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't cloak the ANCM setup folder #44857

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member

This is required for #44828

@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky requested review from a team as code owners November 13, 2024 22:51
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the untriaged Request triage from a team member label Nov 13, 2024
@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

Failing CI legs are unrelated and failing elsewhere. Merging.

@MichaelSimons MichaelSimons merged commit 2d87cb8 into dotnet:main Nov 14, 2024
31 of 37 checks passed
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky deleted the aspnet-no-cloak branch November 14, 2024 04:03
@mthalman
Copy link
Member

@premun - This change has been merged into the VMR (dotnet/dotnet@56d41c7) but the originally cloaked directory hasn't been added back. It's still excluded in the sources: https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet/tree/main/src/aspnetcore/src/Installers/Windows/AspNetCoreModule-Setup. Why is that?

@premun
Copy link
Member

premun commented Nov 14, 2024

@mthalman uncloaking does not synchronize it there, manual PR must be opened in the VMR directly with the contents that correspond to the SHA the repository is present in the VMR in

@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

@mthalman uncloaking does not synchronize it there, manual PR must be opened in the VMR directly with the contents that correspond to the SHA the repository is present in the VMR in

Is there a tracting issue to support this scenario?

@premun
Copy link
Member

premun commented Nov 14, 2024

I don't think it was ever planned to be honest - adding exclusion rules also requires removal of the content.

We can log an issue but not sure we'd fund it as the exclusions is something we won't have going forward.
Do you think it would be a frequent scenario in servicing?

@premun
Copy link
Member

premun commented Nov 14, 2024

Or.. do we want to have exclusions in the full flat VMR codeflow?

@MichaelSimons
Copy link
Member

We are still going to need/want exclusions going forward IMO. I agree updating them is an uncommon code flow. I guess I am looking for a better UX. Today there is continuous uncertainty on what steps are needed as evidence here.

@premun
Copy link
Member

premun commented Nov 14, 2024

I will log an issue. We will have a new person starting soon so this looks like a good candidate for an intro issue.

@mthalman
Copy link
Member

@jkoritzinsky - You'll need to follow the guidance above to make this available in the VMR.

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

just FYI, @jkoritzinsky is out for a few days

@premun
Copy link
Member

premun commented Nov 14, 2024

I created dotnet/arcade-services#4152 but during writing it realized it might be quite a problematic one

ViktorHofer added a commit to dotnet/dotnet that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
See dotnet/sdk#44857 for more details
on why this is necessary.
@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

Submitted dotnet/dotnet#110. PTAL

ViktorHofer added a commit to dotnet/dotnet that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-VMR untriaged Request triage from a team member
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants