You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description:
We’re testing OpenSSL 3.2 in Envoy.
Some tests are failing.
Some of the failures seem related to the security level, which has been raised from 1 (in OpenSSL 3.0.x) to 2 (in OpenSSL 3.2.x).
TLS < 1.2 is not supported in security level 2.
Then in tls_inspector_test the following sub-tests:
SniRegistered,
AlpnRegistered,
MultipleReads,
NoExtensions,
will fail with input parameters TLS1_VERSION and TLS1_1_VERSION.
And the following will fail too, as they are using TLS1.0 and 1.1:
ConnectionJA3HashTls10NoExtensions,
ConnectionJA3HashTls11,
Then I’d ask if there are any plans for BoringSSL work in light of the security level 2.
Title: Tests depending on security level
Description:
We’re testing OpenSSL 3.2 in Envoy.
Some tests are failing.
Some of the failures seem related to the security level, which has been raised from 1 (in OpenSSL 3.0.x) to 2 (in OpenSSL 3.2.x).
TLS < 1.2 is not supported in security level 2.
Then in tls_inspector_test the following sub-tests:
will fail with input parameters TLS1_VERSION and TLS1_1_VERSION.
And the following will fail too, as they are using TLS1.0 and 1.1:
Then I’d ask if there are any plans for BoringSSL work in light of the security level 2.
[optional Relevant Links:]
See at the following link for more info on security levels:
https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/flashsystem-5x00/8.6.0?topic=r-security-levels-supported-security-ciphers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: