How to submit News items?

[anjohnson]

There is no link on the News page explaining how to submit news items. The current items look to have been copied from my News page, which had about 2-3 items a year. If we want to increase the frequency of new items we probably need to make it easier for people to submit items (and we should seed the page with the kinds of things we want to see on it; Mark Rivers is about to announce a new release of Asyn for example). I found the How to submit news to the EPICS Website document, but that does require all EPICS news sources to sign up for an account, which I see as a discouragement.

Can I suggest putting a link on the News and Events page to a form for entering a news item that the site maintainers could turn into a posting? The form page could also encourage submitters to sign up for an account, but we if we force them to do that first we probably aren't going to get as many entries.

[ralphlange]

+1
Valid request, good idea.
I will come up with a test candidate later today.

[ralphlange]

That test candidate will be a form generating a mail. To whom? Webmaster? Dedicated victim?

Independent from that technical issue is the question: What release related postings do we want to move onto the web site as opposed to tech-talk messages? Obvious options are:

1. Release notices of Base only?
2. Release notices for a defined list of "widely used modules"?
3. Release notices for all modules listed on the site?
4. Release notices for anything?

We would probably keep the cross-posting of any news items on tech talk, to get the broadest audience.
So - could the form just ask for the link to the tech-talk message to add as a news item?
And - if manual intervention is necessary anyway, couldn't we just start to add selected tech-talk content, and require using the form only for things that don't match our filters?

[ttkorhonen]

Adding a low-threshold posting form is fine.
We even have one: "Contact us". It has the possibility to even submit files. Do we need to invent something new? We could point people to this page. Hurdle is very low. Having more pages for posting would just make it more confusing.

While we are at this: we have discussed the policies on a couple of occasions. If changes are wanted it is fine but let us think them through well before implementing.

[ralphlange]

Having a different contact form would add a way for more required fields (e.g. link to tech-talk message, link to "read more" somewhere else) and removing fields (file upload makes no sense for a news item).

In Flamingo (database for incoming mails through contact forms) you can filter by contact form.

Re: policies. Where can I find them?

[ralphlange]

And: Sure. I will stop working on this issue until I receive clear instructions. No problem with that.

[ttkorhonen]

I hope you did not get offended! I just am concerned that first we asked people to join so that they can submit posts. Then soon after we ask them to do that by a web form. I would be rather confused.

We have discussed the policies (or rather processes) a few times; there is no single document, only scattered notes in meeting minutes and emails. The most recent discussion was about the contributor vs author roles, and the review workflow. I can try to put together a description of what I think we have agreed on so far. We can take a look together then to see if we agree.

[ralphlange]

I completely agree with your argumentation, and was never planning to publicly change this without discussion. Note that my line of arguments in my 2nd comment goes in the direction of not using a form based approach.
All I started was to provide a non-public sample implementation using the existing plugins to have something tangible to talk about.

I can't remember we talked about our policies for news items on the site - that should be clarified before doing anything publicly visible, and that's the discussion I was hoping to start with my comment above.

Btw. that existing contact form is the one I fixed and activated last week. It seems to be aligned better with whatever policies that might apply... But I can easily roll it back to the broken state if you prefer. :-P

[ttkorhonen]

Sorry, I forgot the point about the contact form. Thank you for fixing it, please do not even think of rolling back.

What I refer to here as news items are those short posts that appear on the "News and Events" page. Those can be edited by "contributor"s as the first right they have after registration and approval. All posts by contributors have to go to the "simple approval" workflow. Approval can be done by Administrators or Editors currently. After approval, posts go the website. Approver can also reject the post or ask the contributor to revise the text. Or edit it him/herself.
Now the issue to be discussed is if there should be a parallel way to do this, and how should it look like. Also the other things like linking to a tech-talk post, etc. are new and have not been defined yet.
It looks like a good idea to ask for a link to the tech-talk article. However, then somebody still has to edit the post. On the other hand we can just pick items from tech-talk and add them as posts. This is how the post for the Australian EPICS meeting was added. Today there are already three announcements on tech-talk: PCAS, ASYN and quadEM. These would be good to have on the website. There is only one drawback: the fall meeting announcement will go down the list. Maybe we need to change the "Past Meetings" item to "Collaboration Meetings" and add there a section for "Upcoming Meetings" instead of past only.
This got a bit long...my apologies.

[ralphlange]

As we have a lot of modules, I would suggest limiting the release posts to option 1 or 2 of my above comment.
Otherwise everything else on the news and events will go down the drain.

[ttkorhonen]

This is reasonable. Of the three above, Asyn release would qualify, PCAS maybe?, quadEM probably not.

[anjohnson]

When talking about items getting pushed down the list by newer items, are you just concerned about the front page (where we only show the top 3 items) or the whole News and Events page? Would it be possible to add a flag that marks specific news items as "show me on the front page"? Some bulletin-board systems provide the ability to pin an item to the top of the list of discussions, which is similar to what I'm suggesting, or maybe this might be done with a tag?

Just an idea, don't know if it's possible...

[ralphlange]

So my suggestion would be:

• Put "News and Events" in a category separate from "Release Announcements".
• Add "frontpage" as a tag to the items that we want to see there.
• Add a filter to the frontpage teaser to only show items tagged "frontpage".
• Make the "News" page display two columns: "News and events" left and "Releases" right.
• Create a template post that can be used for release announcements & document this.

Comments anyone?