|
3158 | 3158 | "champion": { "name": "SirSpudlington", "discord": "txtiger" } |
3159 | 3159 | } |
3160 | 3160 | ], |
3161 | | - "laymanDescription": "Creates a standardized way for new transaction-level signature algorithms to be added. Which allows easier migration and higher interoperability with current systems.", |
| 3161 | + "laymanDescription": "Creates a standardized way for new transaction-level signature algorithms to be added, which allows easier migration and higher interoperability with current systems.", |
3162 | 3162 | "northStars": ["Improve UX"], |
3163 | 3163 | "northStarAlignment": { |
3164 | 3164 | "improveUX": { |
3165 | | - "description": "Improves user experience by enabling easier adoption of alternative signatures without placing too high a burden on app developers. EIP-7932 also improves security by providing a pathway for quantum safe account migration." |
| 3165 | + "description": "Improves user experience by enabling easier adoption of alternative signatures without placing too high a burden on app developers. EIP-7932 also improves security by providing a pathway for quantum-safe account migration." |
3166 | 3166 | } |
3167 | 3167 | }, |
3168 | 3168 | "stakeholderImpacts": { |
3169 | 3169 | "endUsers": { |
3170 | | - "description": "Improves security by allowing users to choose other signing algorithms. Potentially the option for native TPM / passkey support." |
| 3170 | + "description": "Improves security by allowing users to choose other signing algorithms, potentially enabling native TPM / passkey support." |
3171 | 3171 | }, |
3172 | 3172 | "appDevs": { |
3173 | 3173 | "description": "Allows abstracting implementation of multiple signature schemes to a single standardized interface. No work is required to support EIP-7932 transactions natively." |
3174 | 3174 | }, |
3175 | 3175 | "walletDevs": { |
3176 | | - "description": "Large changes to transaction / key handling required for wallets to support optional wrapping and signing functionality." |
| 3176 | + "description": "Large changes to transaction / key handling are required for wallets to support optional wrapping and signing functionality." |
3177 | 3177 | }, |
3178 | 3178 | "toolingInfra": { |
3179 | | - "description": "Requires large initial modifications for EIP implementation but lower future overhead on introduction of new algorithms." |
| 3179 | + "description": "Requires large initial modifications for EIP implementation but reduces future overhead when introducing new algorithms." |
3180 | 3180 | }, |
3181 | 3181 | "layer2s": { |
3182 | 3182 | "description": "No direct impact on layer 2s unless this EIP is adopted by that L2." |
|
3979 | 3979 | "description": "Expands wallet capabilities to support new signature types." |
3980 | 3980 | }, |
3981 | 3981 | "toolingInfra": { |
3982 | | - "description": "Requires simple update to support P256 signature verification." |
| 3982 | + "description": "Requires a simple update to support P256 signature verification." |
3983 | 3983 | }, |
3984 | 3984 | "layer2s": { |
3985 | 3985 | "description": "Sequencers may utilize P256 for settling L1 proofs." |
3986 | 3986 | }, |
3987 | 3987 | "stakersNodes": { |
3988 | | - "description": "Would have little effect to Node Operators." |
| 3988 | + "description": "Would have little effect on Node Operators." |
3989 | 3989 | }, |
3990 | 3990 | "clClients": { |
3991 | 3991 | "description": "No direct CL effects as this EIP only affects the execution layer." |
3992 | 3992 | }, |
3993 | 3993 | "elClients": { |
3994 | | - "description": "Would require minimal update to point the new EIP-7932 entry to the existing P256 precompile." |
| 3994 | + "description": "Would require a minimal update to point the new EIP-7932 entry to the existing P256 precompile." |
3995 | 3995 | } |
3996 | 3996 | }, |
3997 | 3997 | "benefits": [ |
|
0 commit comments