Skip to content

Question about exposed types #24

@jonathanfishbein1

Description

@jonathanfishbein1

I feel like I'm missing something and there's a good reason why. But why are some of the functions that would faciliate an elm-playground application being used in a broader elm application not exposed? Would this be a useful package?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions