Skip to content

inconsistent RFC links #363

Description

@alxndrsn

There are 3 different styles of links to RFCs in this repo:

It might be helpful to pick one and stick with it, unless there is a specific reason to prefer different links in different situations.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions