Extra features and functionality for next major version, from other RFCs relating to JWT or for exported helper functions #460
equalsgibson
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
If there is a more appropriate place to discuss this, please let me know and I'll move the discussion / delete this post. Thanks!
Hi,
The current implementation supports the main JWT RFC (RFC7519) - moving foward for the next version, is there any interest in adding functionality from other RFCs?
Such as;
Also, within this library there are currently some defined Claims types (MapClaims, RegisteredClaims) - would there be interest in adding more Claim types for supporting specific token types, such as OIDC tokens, Access Tokens etc? I expect that if this was agreed, it would only be the types that are backed by a corresponding accepted RFC
Example for OIDC Access Token (RFC9068)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9068#name-requesting-a-jwt-access-tokHeader:
Claims:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions