Open
Description
Go version
go version go1.23.6 darwin/arm64
Output of go env
in your module/workspace:
GO111MODULE='on'
GOARCH='arm64'
GOBIN=''
GOCACHE='/Users/radu/Library/Caches/go-build'
GOENV='/Users/radu/Library/Application Support/go/env'
GOEXE=''
GOEXPERIMENT=''
GOFLAGS=''
GOHOSTARCH='arm64'
GOHOSTOS='darwin'
GOINSECURE=''
GOMODCACHE='/Users/radu/go/pkg/mod'
GONOPROXY=''
GONOSUMDB=''
GOOS='darwin'
GOPATH='/Users/radu/go'
GOPRIVATE=''
GOPROXY='https://proxy.golang.org,direct'
GOROOT='/Users/radu/go/pkg/mod/golang.org/[email protected]'
GOSUMDB='sum.golang.org'
GOTMPDIR=''
GOTOOLCHAIN='auto'
GOTOOLDIR='/Users/radu/go/pkg/mod/golang.org/[email protected]/pkg/tool/darwin_arm64'
GOVCS=''
GOVERSION='go1.23.6'
GODEBUG=''
GOTELEMETRY='local'
GOTELEMETRYDIR='/Users/radu/Library/Application Support/go/telemetry'
GCCGO='gccgo'
GOARM64='v8.0'
AR='ar'
CC='clang'
CXX='clang++'
CGO_ENABLED='1'
GOMOD='/Users/radu/go/src/github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/go.mod'
GOWORK=''
CGO_CFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_CPPFLAGS=''
CGO_CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_FFLAGS='-O2 -g'
CGO_LDFLAGS='-O2 -g'
PKG_CONFIG='pkg-config'
GOGCCFLAGS='-fPIC -arch arm64 -pthread -fno-caret-diagnostics -Qunused-arguments -fmessage-length=0 -ffile-prefix-map=/var/folders/x0/5yrxw_4s271g705vjscld23c0000gq/T/go-build4216578675=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches -fno-common'
What did you do?
func BenchmarkFoo(b *testing.B) {
b.RunParallel(func(pb *testing.PB) {
n := 0
for pb.Next() {
n++
}
fmt.Fprintf(io.Discard, " %d\n", n)
})
}
What did you see happen?
go test -bench BenchmarkFoo -run - ./internal/cache --count 1
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/internal/cache
cpu: Apple M1 Pro
BenchmarkFoo-10 1000000000 0.08839 ns/op
PASS
ok github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/internal/cache 0.351s
go test -bench BenchmarkFoo -run - ./internal/cache --count 1 --benchtime=100000000x
goos: darwin
goarch: arm64
pkg: github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/internal/cache
cpu: Apple M1 Pro
BenchmarkFoo-10 100000000 73.14 ns/op
PASS
ok github.com/cockroachdb/pebble/internal/cache 7.552s
What did you expect to see?
I expected the second variant to yield a similar result. 73ns per operation cannot be right.