[enhancement:DSLX] Validate "input" as a parameter at the DSLX level (long before codegen)

[cdleary]

What's hard to do? (limit 100 words)

Right now if you use "input" as a parameter name for a function, DSLX will accept it happily, but if you try to run that through code generation it will give you:

Error: INVALID_ARGUMENT: Port `input` is a keyword.; Running pass #15: Legalize names to avoid keywords [short: name_legalization]; Running pass #15: Top level codegen pass pipeline [short: codegen]

Current best alternative workaround (limit 100 words)

Rename the argument by hand.

Your view of the "best case XLS enhancement" (limit 100 words)

Flag this as either a warning or an error at the DSLX level. I'd welcome some input on whether it's best to be a warning or an error.

[cdleary]

Also note that in is a DSLX keyword, so generically describing something that is "an input of some kind" can cause a user to bump into a few things.