You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Steps to reproduce the issue
See the issue description.
Expected behavior
The page should say the resolver is "Passthrough" or "Language-dependent" for the grpc.io:50051 example and not say "By default, DNS is assumed."
It can also have a row explicitly for "Passthrough" using passthrough:///grpc.io:50051.
For example:
Resolver
Example
Notes
Language-dependent
grpc.io:50051
In Go, Passthrough is used by default. In Java, ....
Passthrough
passthrough:///grpc.io:50051
Unlike the DNS resolver, this creates a single sub-connection instead of pre-resolving the DNS and making a separate sub-connection for each IP address.
Screenshots
This is what the page currently looks like:
Desktop (if relevant):
N/A
Mobile (if relevant):
N/A
Additional info
It took me and my coworkers a long time and digging into the gRPC client source code to debug why our gRPC client wasn't working as expected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Issue description
The Custom Name Resolution page says "By default, DNS is assumed." but the actual code for the Go client sets "passthrough" as the default scheme. I haven't checked what happens in other languages.
Steps to reproduce the issue
See the issue description.
Expected behavior
The page should say the resolver is "Passthrough" or "Language-dependent" for the
grpc.io:50051
example and not say "By default, DNS is assumed."It can also have a row explicitly for "Passthrough" using
passthrough:///grpc.io:50051
.For example:
grpc.io:50051
passthrough:///grpc.io:50051
Screenshots
This is what the page currently looks like:
Desktop (if relevant):
N/A
Mobile (if relevant):
N/A
Additional info
It took me and my coworkers a long time and digging into the gRPC client source code to debug why our gRPC client wasn't working as expected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: