The delete unused binding code action seems to leave the Haddock attached to the binding it was meant to delete.
Your environment
Which OS do you use? NixOs
Which version of GHC do you use and how did you install it? 9.10.2
How is your project built (alternative: link to the project)? cabal-install
Which LSP client (editor/plugin) do you use? emacs+lsp-mode
Which version of HLS do you use and how did you install it? 2.11.0.0
Have you configured HLS in any way (especially: a hie.yaml file)? not particularly
Steps to reproduce
If I have a definition like:
module Foo () where
{- | My haddock goes here
-}
foo :: Int
foo = ...
and foo is unused, then I get a code action to delete foo.
If I trigger this code action then the definition of foo is deleted by the haddock comment is left, even though it is attached to foo.
Expected behaviour
I would expect the Haddock docstring to also get deleted.
Actual behaviour
The Haddock docstring is not deleted.
Debug information
The delete unused binding code action seems to leave the Haddock attached to the binding it was meant to delete.
Your environment
Which OS do you use? NixOs
Which version of GHC do you use and how did you install it? 9.10.2
How is your project built (alternative: link to the project)? cabal-install
Which LSP client (editor/plugin) do you use? emacs+lsp-mode
Which version of HLS do you use and how did you install it? 2.11.0.0
Have you configured HLS in any way (especially: a
hie.yamlfile)? not particularlySteps to reproduce
If I have a definition like:
and
foois unused, then I get a code action to deletefoo.If I trigger this code action then the definition of
foois deleted by the haddock comment is left, even though it is attached tofoo.Expected behaviour
I would expect the Haddock docstring to also get deleted.
Actual behaviour
The Haddock docstring is not deleted.
Debug information