We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
背景:我在若干年前遇见过和你一样的情况。针对该情况,有比较清晰的理解。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
一审二审都宣判完了,也请了律师的
Sorry, something went wrong.
刚在后面看到了一审的法律文本
二审没有检索到。 可以看得出来,法院对于证据的采信,确实有倾向于360的地方。但是这个是法官的自由裁定权。 特别是:
综上所述,一审提交证据不完全。 以下写一下主观观点: 从360提交的证据来看,其证据形成的证据链有一些漏洞可以反驳,但是遗憾的是并没有在法律文书中体现出来; 从贺大佬的角度来看,以后工作还是要注意一些防范,不要被抓住漏洞,用工作的话语来说就是合规; 从我们其他劳动者的角度来看,都挺难的。
之前公司裁哪个,完全就看领导的一句话;当然,领导也是几个月换一个。
No branches or pull requests
背景:我在若干年前遇见过和你一样的情况。针对该情况,有比较清晰的理解。
以上,我专门切账号上来回复。
大佬加油!
祝你维权成功!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: