[Resource]: Ouroboros

[Q00]

Display Name

Ouroboros

Category

Agent Orchestration

Link

https://github.com/Q00/ouroboros

Author Name

Q00

Author Link

https://github.com/Q00

Description

A local-first Agent OS for spec-first AI coding. Wraps Claude Code and other CLI agents in a replayable interview → seed → execute → evaluate → evolve workflow, recording every action as a Seed-bound, ledger-tracked event for auditability and reproducibility.

Checklist

• I have visited this repo before with my own eyes, and I have confirmed that this resource is sufficiently distinct from any existing resource
• All links are working and publicly accessible
• This resource is specific to Claude Code
• I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md
• I promise I actually did these things and not doing so is shameful and lazy
• Do not check the following box - leave it unchecked. By checking this box, I admit that I am not reading any of these statements.

[Q00]

I edited the description above. Flagging it here rather than editing quietly, since this already passed validation and a maintainer may have read the original.

The original led with "spec-first AI coding" as the category. That's accurate but not distinct — it's a crowded description shared by several other tools in this same list section. The edit swaps it for the one thing that's actually specific to this project: when an acceptance criterion defines a verify command or expected-output assertion, those values are withheld from the worker's contract block before it runs, with no flag to put them back. Everything else in the description (the interview → seed → execute → evaluate → evolve pipeline, the ledger-tracked events) is unchanged.

Nothing about the entry's category, links, or checklist changed. If the longer description is a problem for the list's formatting, let me know and I'll trim it.

[Q00]

Correction to my comment above: I've reverted the description to the original wording.

I mistook the previous text for my own draft copy. It wasn't — it was rewritten by this project's maintainer, in their own words, distinct from what I'd originally prepared. That's their call to make, not mine to overwrite based on my own later positioning preferences, so I've restored it.

Apologies for the noise on an already-validated submission.

[github-actions]

🤖 Validation Results

✅ All validation checks passed! Your recommendation is ready for a maintainer to review.

Parsed data

{
  "display_name": "Ouroboros",
  "category": "Agent Orchestration",
  "link": "https://github.com/Q00/ouroboros",
  "author_name": "Q00",
  "author_link": "https://github.com/Q00",
  "description": "A local-first Agent OS for spec-first AI coding. Wraps Claude Code and other CLI agents in a replayable interview → seed → execute → evaluate → evolve workflow, recording every action as a Seed-bound, ledger-tracked event for auditability and reproducibility."
}

---

_{Re-runs automatically when you edit the issue.}