Skip to content

Add support for BBS+ Signatures #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
swcurran opened this issue Nov 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Add support for BBS+ Signatures #10

swcurran opened this issue Nov 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
AnonCreds v2 To Do Needed as part of AnonCreds v2

Comments

@swcurran
Copy link
Member

swcurran commented Nov 12, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Dependent on #9.

Note that due to the additional ZKP capabilities that are defined for AnonCreds v2 (including link secret, equality of claims across credentials, predicates, and possibly others), it is expected that the BBS+ signature implementation may have features beyond the currently proposed IETF BBS+ specification.
@swcurran swcurran added the AnonCreds v2 To Do Needed as part of AnonCreds v2 label Nov 12, 2023
@mikelodder7
Copy link
Contributor

See #42

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
AnonCreds v2 To Do Needed as part of AnonCreds v2
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mikelodder7 @swcurran