You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the discussion of #7 , @tianluyuan raised the concern about run_id and event_id not being unique for simulated events in the input file.
It is to be noted that the current i3_to_json.py functionality does not fully support the case of multiple events with same run_id and event_id. It is then out of scope of PR #7 to address this issue.
We currently still need a unique (run_id, event_id) for SkyDriver as well.
So either:
the user makes sure that run_id and event_id are unique and properly defined in the input data;
skywriter must find a way to map each simulated event to a unique run_id and event_id combination;
SkyDriver implements an unique id that is not based on (run_id, event_id), but this becomes increasingly inconvenient for the user.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the discussion of #7 , @tianluyuan raised the concern about run_id and event_id not being unique for simulated events in the input file.
It is to be noted that the current
i3_to_json.py
functionality does not fully support the case of multiple events with samerun_id
andevent_id
. It is then out of scope of PR #7 to address this issue.We currently still need a unique (
run_id
,event_id
) forSkyDriver
as well.So either:
run_id
andevent_id
are unique and properly defined in the input data;skywriter
must find a way to map each simulated event to a uniquerun_id
andevent_id
combination;run_id
,event_id
), but this becomes increasingly inconvenient for the user.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: